Saturday, 6 March 2010
how the earth made us
Recently watched the bbc series ‘how the earth made us‘ with Dr Iain Stewart. One of those national geographic type perspective-expanding programmes. Struck by the mix of bounty, opportunity and risk in nature. For instance, the cyclical patterns of the trade winds, circling round the atlantic, and how the early explorers learned to exploit them to travel to the Americas and back again. Or continental plate boundaries’ resources of oil and water. But the same natural marvels, coupled with human folly or mistake, of course carry risk and danger too, and can cause great pain: earthquakes, volcanoes, shipwreck, disease and death on the slave ships. But we’re also given the capacity to improve things. I don’t really get the fixation some atheists have with the misconceptions of perfection and absolutes in God and in creation. Theology has developed a far more rugged and robust view of God and his relation to creation and his creatures. Akin to parent and child in ‘macrocosm’. Full of risk, pain, mess, but with a steady heartbeat of love and joy - strong, heady - pulsing through.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I don’t really get the fixation some atheists have with the misconceptions of perfection and absolutes in God and in creation.
Erm, how can I put this - it's the christians that have this fixation - particularly the fundies and often love quoting "and god saw that it was good".
They then love to quote from the expulsion from eden - suffering etc.
Let's not forget good old former presidential candidate and endorser of Sarah Palin, Pat Robertson and co too - Haiti's earthquake was punishment for sin - no it wasn't - it was a purely physical phenomenon http://scienceblogs.com/highlyalloc
hthonous/2010/01
/tectonics_of_the_haiti_earthqu.php
Then there is the moral absolute nonsense you will find on any fundie apologetic site - so, please don't blame the atheists for the nut bags in your religion.
When you actually look at what you personally believe, you have to jump so many hoops to try and keep up with reality - theology is a house of card built on sand
BTW,
There really is no evidence for this god that you speak of. The world works fine on physical explanations - you have just removed god, as the god you talk of would be indistinguishable from one who is not there at all.
'theology is a house of card built on sand'
thank you mr sands! :)
Post a Comment